I bought it for 30 euros which imo is exactly the price that it is worth. Also, AI in WARNO > AI in Red Dragon.īe aware that the game goes on sale fairly regularly. WARNO is more polished, has more QoL features, better graphics, MUCH better sound, constant updates, a promised map editor and modding tools (we will see about that :/). Tl Dr: Red Dragon has more variety (as of now) but is incredibly hard to get into. WARNO is also better on the technical side. That being said, in Red Dragon you fight on more diverse maps in a Chinese/Korean/Central Asian context whereas WARNO only has green, continental climate maps.Īlso, from what I have experienced the AI in Eugen Games was significantly improved with the Steel Division games, and WARNO benefits from that. None which would be carried by mere platoons of assault engineers ingame. Blowing bridges would require a massive load of explosives or very special ordnances dedicated to achieve just that. Thousands of units, strange metas that don't really correspond with common sense, all in all a game with a lot of learning specific parameters and than spam your units towards the enemy. Blowing up a bridge is not a decision made at the level of wargame commanders. You also have to consider that Red Dragon is an absolute nightmare to get into. All the negative reviews stem from the fact that WARNO is more similar to Steel Division than it is to Wargame. About the Video: I'm joined by Nico in a game of Red DragonLeave a comment and Like to support the video or series-Want to buy some games Why not support. Inset image from Piercing Fortress Europa by Frank Hunter of Adanac Command Studiesįooter image from Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa by Victor Reijkersz of VRDesignsĭefinitively WARNO when you want a Steel Division type of game. Header image from World War II Europe by Ron Dockal of Schwerpunkt Games Forests catch fire in the wake of napalm strikes, missiles criss-cross in the sky above. Wargame: Red Dragon > General Discussions > Topic Details. Davidson joins me again as we take the fight back to the pact in the second campaign in Wargame: AirLand Battle The race is on to secure Oslo, Copenhagen an. Red Dragon, more than any prior Wargame, delivers on the spectacle. Related Subreddits: /r/wargames /r/hexandcounter /r/StrategyGames /r/digitaltabletop /r/paradoxplaza /r/totalwar /r/CMANO /r/WarBlog /r/wargame/ /r/MilitaryHistory/ All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews. In all seriousness, why does a campaign scenario have to be 'balanced' at all So what if one side has a considerable advantage, if it's the nature of the scenario In fact it is extremely common in, you know, wargames for the scenario to have unbalanced initial conditions and objectives, possibly including optional objectives. The miniatures are virtual, rulesets/opponents are often handled by the AI! Touching history with digital Hex and chits. A computer based wargaming community for the appreciation of historical wargames.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |